Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1349

reference
928-tree-1
name
1349
tree-preservation-order

undefined

928-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.033098 50.876652)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.033041 50.876646,-1.033043 50.876657,-1.033051 50.876667,-1.033064 50.876675,-1.033079 50.876680,-1.033097 50.876682,-1.033115 50.876681,-1.033131 50.876676,-1.033143 50.876668,-1.033152 50.876658,-1.033155 50.876647,-1.033152 50.876636,-1.033144 50.876625,-1.033132 50.876617,-1.033116 50.876612,-1.033098 50.876610,-1.033081 50.876612,-1.033065 50.876617,-1.033052 50.876625,-1.033044 50.876635,-1.033041 50.876646)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL